4.5 Article

The relation between obesity and asthmatic airway inflammation

Journal

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 344-350

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2004.00164.x

Keywords

asthma; breath condensate; exhaled nitric oxide; leukotriene B-4; obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiologic studies suggest increased asthma prevalence in obese subjects. However, the relation between obesity and airway inflammation remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the relation between obesity indices and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) and leukotriene B-4 (LTB4) in children with asthma. Asthmatic patients aged 7-18 yr old were recruited. Weight-for-height Z score was calculated from anthropometry. ENO was measured by online single-breath method using a chemiluminescence analyzer, whereas LTB4 concentrations in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) were quantified using competitive enzyme immunoassay. Ninety-two asthmatics and 23 controls were recruited. The mean ENO and LTB4 concentrations in EBC were higher in asthmatic patients (87 p.p.b. and 40.5 pg/ml) than controls (25 p.p.b. and 18.7 pg/ml) (p < 0.0001 for both). Obesity, as defined by weight >120% median weight-for-height, was not associated with any alteration in ENO or LTB4 concentrations in patients with asthma. Besides, these inflammatory markers did not differ between asthmatics in the highest and lowest quartiles of weight-for-height Z score. On multivariate analysis, ENO showed significant correlation with age (beta = 0.511, p < 0.0001), peripheral blood eosinophil count (beta = 0.222, p = 0.019), plasma total IgE concentration (beta = 0.187, p = 0.050) and forced expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1; beta = -0.221, p = 0.014). None of the factors was associated with LTB4 concentration in EBC. In conclusion, ENO and LTB4 concentration in EBC are increased in childhood asthma. However, these inflammatory markers did not differ between obese and non-obese children with asthma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available