4.6 Article

External quality control assessment in PCR diagnostics of dengue virus infections

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 291-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2003.11.002

Keywords

RT-PCR; dengue virus; ENIVD; EQA; diagnostic

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Increased travelling to countries endemic for dengue fever (DF) demands efficient laboratory diagnostics. Nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT) are now frequently used for rapid diagnosis of imported viral diseases. Different PCR systems are available. Objectives: In order to assess the quality of molecular diagnostics of dengue virus infections, an external quality assurance (EQA) in PCR diagnostics was conducted. Study design: A panel of 10 human plasma samples was prepared and spiked with dengue virus types DEN-1 to DEN-4. In addition, a 10-fold dilution series (1:10-1:10(4)) of DEN-3 virus was included. The panel was pre-tested by nested RT-PCR, in-house real-time PCR, and a commercial real-time PCR kit. The samples were inactivated by gamma irradiation and shipped in freeze dried state. Thirteen laboratories, within the European network for the diagnostics of imported viral diseases (ENIVD) took part using either single-round, nested, or real-time RT-PCR methods. Two laboratories used two methods in parallel, summarising up to 15 comparable results. Results: 33-100% correct results were achieved. All laboratories detected DEN-2 correctly, followed by DEN-I (14 positive results of 15), DEN-3 (12/15) and DEN-4 (11115). Testing of the serial dilution revealed low sensitivity in many labs, with results ranging from 33 to 80% of correctly tested samples. Conclusion: The EQA gives a feedback of the quality of the RT-PCR system used by each respective laboratory. The different test systems and amplification conditions demonstrate the importance of external quality control measures. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available