4.6 Article

Herpes simplex virus 1 has multiple mechanisms for blocking virus-induced interferon production

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 16, Pages 8411-8420

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.16.8411-8420.2004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI20530, AI44821, R01 AI020530, R01 AI044821] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In response to viral infection, host cells elicit a number of responses, including the expression of alpha/beta interferon (IFN-alpha/beta). In these cells, IFN regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3) undergoes a sequence of posttranslational modifications that allow it to act as a potent transcriptional coactivator of specific IFN genes, including IFN-beta. We investigated the mechanisms by which herpes simplex virus I (HSV-1) inhibits the production of IFN-beta mediated by the IRF-3 signaling pathway. Here, we show that HSV-1 infection can block the accumulation of IFN-beta triggered by Sendai virus (SeV) infection. Our results indicate that HSV-1 infection blocks the nuclear accumulation of activated IRF-3 but does not block the initial virus-induced phosphorylation of IRF-3. The former effect was at least partly mediated by increased turnover of IRF-3 in HSV-1-infected cells. Using mutant viruses, we determined that the immediate-early protein ICP0 was necessary for the inhibition of IRF-3 nuclear accumulation. Expression of ICP0 also had the ability to reduce IFN-beta production induced by SeV infection. ICP0 has been shown previously to play a role in HSV-1 sensitivity to IFN and in the inhibition of antiviral gene production. However, we observed that an ICP0 mutant virus still retained the ability to inhibit the production of IFN-beta. These results argue that HSV-1 has multiple mechanisms to inhibit the production of IFN-beta, providing additional ways in which HSV-1 can block the IFN-mediated host response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available