4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

High-dose intravenous vitamin C is not associated with an increase of pro-oxidative biomarkers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 58, Issue 8, Pages 1151-1158

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601943

Keywords

high-dose vitamin C; ascorbyl free radical kinetics; lacking pro-oxidative damage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: High-dose vitamin C therapy might mediate beneficial clinical effects by counteracting reactive oxygen species. However, concerns are raised whether this approach might provoke diametrical (ie pro-oxidative) effects. The objective was to determine ascorbyl free radical (AFR) concentrations and potential variables of pro-oxidative damage. Design: Crossover study; six healthy males received daily infusions of 750 or 7500 mg vitamin C for six consecutive days. Fasting concentrations of vitamin C and AFR were determined daily. On day 1, concentrations of vitamin C and AFR were measured at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post infusion. Plasma concentrations of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS), tocopherol and urine concentrations of 8-oxoguanosine were determined on days 1 and 6. Results: Kinetic studies on day 1 showed that concentrations of vitamin C and AFR displayed parallel dose- and time-dependent kinetics and elimination was highly efficient. Vitamin C and AFR fasting concentrations on days 2-6 were slightly above the baseline, suggesting new, stable steady states. TBARS decreased in both groups, whereas tocopherol and 8-oxoguanosine concentrations remained unchanged. Conclusion: Kinetics of AFR largely depend on plasma vitamin C concentrations and AFR is eliminated efficiently. Our data do not support induction of pro-oxidative effects in healthy volunteers given intravenous high-dose vitamin C. Sponsorship: Pascoe Pharmazeutische Praparate GmbH, Giebetaen, Germany.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available