4.7 Article

Genomic analysis distinguishes Mycobacterium africanum

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 3594-3599

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.42.8.3594-3599.2004

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mycobacterium africanum is thought to comprise a unique species within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. M. africanum has traditionally been identified by phenotypic criteria, occupying an intermediate position between M. tuberculosis and M. bovis according to biochemical characteristics. Although M. africanum isolates present near-identical sequence homology to other species of the M. tuberculosis complex, several studies have uncovered large genomic regions variably deleted from certain M. africanum isolates. To further investigate the genomic characteristics of organisms characterized as M. africamun, the DNA content of 12 isolates was interrogated by using Affymetrix GeneChip. Analysis revealed genomic regions of M. tuberculosis deleted from all isolates of putative diagnostic and biological consequence. The distribution of deleted sequences suggests that M. africanum subtype 11 isolates are situated among strains of modern M. tuberculosis. In contrast, other M. africanum isolates (subtype 1) constitute two distinct evolutionary branches within the M. tuberculosis complex. To test for an association between deleted sequences and biochemical attributes used for speciation, a phenotypically diverse panel of M. africanum-like isolates from Guinea-Bissau was tested for these deletions. These isolates clustered together within one of the M. africanum subtype I branches, irrespective of phenotype. These results indicate that convergent biochemical profiles can be independently obtained for M. tuberculosis complex members, challenging the traditional approach to M. tuberculosis complex speciation. Furthermore, the genomic results suggest a rational framework for defining M. africanum and provide tools to accurately assess its prevalence in clinical specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available