4.7 Article

Improved plasma glucose control, whole-body glucose utilization, and lipid profile on a low-glycemic index diet in type 2 diabetic men

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 1866-1872

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1866

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To determine whether a chronic low-glycemic index (LGl) diet, compared with a high-glycemic index (HGI) diet, has beneficial effects on plasma glucose control, lipid metabolism, total fat mass, and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Twelve type 2 diabetic men were randomly allocated to two periods of 4 weeks of an LGI or HGI carbohydrate diet separated by a 4-week washout interval, in a crossover design. RESULTS - The LGI diet induced lower postprandial plasma glucose and insulin profiles and areas under the Curve than after the HGI diet. At the end of the two dietary periods, the 7-day dietary records demonstrated equal daily total energy and macromutrient intake. Body weight and total fat mass Were comparable. Four-week LGI versus HGI diet induced improvment Or fasting plasma glucose (P < 0.01, Delta chanoes during LGI vs. HGI), HbA(1c) (P < 0,01), and whole-body glucose utilization measured by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (P < 0.05). LGI diet induced a decrease In fasting plasma total and LDL cholesterol (Delta changes LGI vs. HGI, P < 0.01), free fatty acids (P < 0.01), apolipoprotein B, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1. activity. CONCLUSIONS - Only 4 weeks of an LGI diet was able to improve glycemic: Control, glucose utilization, some lipid profiles, and the capacity for fibrinolysis in type diabetes. Even if changes in glycemic control were modest during the 4-week period, the use of an LGI diet in a longer-term manner might play an important role in the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available