4.2 Article

Homology between two different Salmonella phages:: Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium phage p22 and Salmonella enterica serovar Anatum var. 15+phageε34

Journal

VIRUS GENES
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 87-98

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:VIRU.0000032792.86188.fb

Keywords

phage; homology; lipopolysaccharide (LPS); Salmonella; LPS binding; modular evolution; monoclonal antibodies

Funding

  1. CCR NIH HHS [RCMI G12 RR03050] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [BRIN PR P20 RR16470, G12 RR003050, P20 RR016470] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06 GM008239, S06 GM050695] Funding Source: Medline
  4. BHP HRSA HHS [MBRS S06 GM50695-04, MBRS SO6 GM008239] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A distinguishing feature of many microorganisms, belonging to the Gram negative group of bacteria, is the presence of the lipopolysaccharide on their cell surface. Salmonella is a prominent member of this group of bacteria. Many Salmonella phages use the LPS as the initial receptor in the infection process and they can distinguish subtle changes in the LPS molecules. The phage protein that is responsible for recognition of these cells is the tail or tailspike protein (TSP). Those TSPs, which use LPS as a receptor, are prokaryotic LPS-binding proteins. As an initial step in using phage TSPs as model systems for a detailed molecular genetic analysis of protein-LPS interactions, a comparison of two phages and their TSPs from two different Salmonella bacterial viruses ( phages), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium phage P22 and Salmonella enterica serovar Anatum var. 15+ phage epsilon(34), is being carried out. This present study shows significant viral protein homology between many viral structural proteins from these two phages including their TSPs. Significantly this report suggests a general structural motif for part of the TSP of phages and suggests that a more detailed comparative analysis of these TSPs is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available