Journal
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 738-745Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01313.x
Keywords
craniomandibular pain; oral parafunctions; stress; electromyography; polysomnography
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In a single case study, the most frequently suggested contributing factors to craniomandibular pain, viz., oral parafunctions and psychological stress, were studied in more detail. During a 13-week study period, questionnaires were completed, in which, among others, jaw muscle pain, bruxism behaviour, and experienced/anticipated stress were noted. During about 40% of the nights, nocturnal masticatory muscle activity (NMMA) was recorded, using single-channel electromyography (EMG). The number of NMMA events per recorded hour was scored, using a detection threshold of 10% of the maximum voluntary contraction level. This threshold was established in a separate study, in which EMG was compared with polysomnography. Stepwise regression analyses indicated, that morning jaw muscle pain could be explained by evening jaw muscle pain for 64% and by alcohol intake for another 2%. In turn, evening jaw muscle pain was explained by daytime clenching for 56% and by vacuum sucking of the tongue for an additional 6%. Finally, daytime clenching was significantly explained by experienced stress for 30%. Data of the recorded nights showed, that variations in NMMA did not contribute to variations in morning jaw muscle pain. This case study corroborates the paradigm that experienced stress may be related to daytime clenching and, in turn, to evening and morning jaw muscle pain.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available