4.6 Article

Healing of intrabony defects following surgical treatment with or without an Er:YAG laser

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 604-608

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00525.x

Keywords

clinical trial; intrabony defects; lasers/therapeutic use; surgical periodontal therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The aim of this controlled, parallel design clinical study was to compare the healing of intrabony periodontal defects following treatment with access flap surgery with and without debridement with an Er:YAG laser. Methods: Twenty-three patients each of whom exhibited one deep intrabony defect were randomly treated with either access flap surgery followed by root surface and defect debridement using an Er:YAG laser (KEY3(R)) (160 mJ, 10 Hz) (test), or with access flap surgery followed by root surface and defect debridement using hand and ultrasonic instruments (control). The following clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and at 6 months: plaque index; gingival index; bleeding on probing; probing depth (PD); gingival recession; and clinical attachment level (CAL). The primary outcome variable was CAL. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found at baseline. Results: No serious adverse events were observed after any of the treatments. The results have shown that in the test group the PD decreased from 7.8+/-1.3 to 4.1+/-1.3 mm (p<0.001) and the CAL changed from 9.8+/-2.9 to 7.2+/-2.5 mm (p<0.001). In the control group the PD decreased from 7.8+/-0.8 to 4.6+/-1.6 mm (p<0.001) and the CAL changed from 9.2+/-1.2 to 7.7+/-1.6 mm (p<0.01). The test group displayed a higher tendency for CAL gain, although this tendency did not prove to be statistically significant. Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that: (i) at 6 months following treatment both therapies led to significant improvements of the investigated clinical parameters, and (ii) an Er:YAG laser may represent a suitable alternative for defect and root surface debridement in conjuction with periodontal surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available