4.7 Article

Plasma homocysteine in obstructive steep apnoea

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages 1325-1329

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.05.018

Keywords

homocysteine; steep apnoea; CPAP

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00585] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-70602, HL-61560, HL-65176, R01 HL065176] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Whether increased homocysteine is one mechanism linking obstructive steep apnoea (OSA) to cardiovascular abnormalities is unclear. We hypothesised that plasma homocysteine would be higher in OSA patients than in control subjects, would increase further during steep, and decrease after treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Methods and Results For study A, homocysteine was measured in 22 OSA patients and 20 controls first before steep, then after 5 h of untreated OSA, and then in the morning after CPAP treatment. Homocysteine was similar in the OSA and control subjects at at[ three time points, and declined overnight in both groups (P = 0.0017, P = 0.036, respectively). To further assess this diurnal variation, we studied plasma homocysteine under a full-night protocol in 10 OSA patients and 12 controls (study 13). Homocysteine was measured before steep, in the morning after steep, and at noon. Results in both OSA and control groups showed an overnight decline in homocysteine which was reversed by noon (repeated measures ANOVA: OSA, P = 0.04; controls, P = 0.02). Study C showed that disturbed steep did not affect homocysteine levels in normal subjects. Conclusion There is a significant diurnal variation in plasma homocysteine, so that homocysteine is lower in the morning after waking. Neither OSA nor disturbed steep elicit acute or chronic changes in homocysteine. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The European Society of Cardiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available