4.6 Article

Astrocyte-induced regulatory T cells mitigate CNS autoimmunity

Journal

GLIA
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 168-179

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20046

Keywords

experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; multiple sclerosis; immunoregulation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although astrocytes presumably participate in maintaining the immune privilege of the central nervous system (CNS), the mechanisms behind their immunoregulatory properties are still largely undefined. In this study, we describe the development of regulatory T cells upon contact with astrocytes. Rat T cells pre-incubated with astrocytes completely lost the ability to proliferate in response to mitogenic stimuli. The cells were blocked in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, expressed less IL-2R, and produced significantly lower amounts of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), but not interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-10, or tumor necrosis factor (TNF). These anergic cells completely prevented mitogen-induced growth of normal T lymphocytes, as well as CNS antigen-driven proliferation of autoreactive T cells. The suppressive activity resided in both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell compartments. Heat-sensitive soluble T-cell factors, not including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) or IL-10, were solely responsible for the observed suppression, as well as for the transfer of suppressive activity to normal T cells. The administration of astrocyte-induced regulatory T cells markedly alleviated CNS inflammation and clinical symptoms of CNS autoimmunity in rats with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Finally, the cells with suppressive properties were readily generated from human lymphocytes after contact with astrocytes. Taken together, these data indicate that astrocyte-induced regulatory T cells might represent an important mechanism for self-limitation of excessive inflammation in the brain. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available