4.5 Article

Age- and sex-dependent development of adrenocortical hyperactivity in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 893-904

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.09.004

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; transgenic mouse model TgCRND8; health check; explorative and anxiety related behavior; HPA axis; SAM system; adrenal tyrosine hydroxylase activity; plasma corticosterone; fecal corticosterone metabolites; adrenocortical hyperactivity; age- and sex-specific effects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated mice of the TgCRND8 line, an APP transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), with respect to behavioral, endocrinological, and neuropathological parameters. Our results show that transgenic and wild-type mice did not differ in their general health status, exploratory and anxiety related behavior as well as in the activity of their sympathetic-adrenomedullary system. Significant differences, however, were found regarding body weight, amyloid plaque formation, and the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenocortical (HPA) axis. Continuous monitoring of glucocorticoid (GC) concentrations over a period of 120 days, utilizing a noninvasive technique to measure corticosterone metabolites in fecal samples, revealed that transgenic animals showed adrenocortical hyperactivity, starting very early in males (from day 30) and later in females (around day 90). It is hypothesized that these changes in the activity of the HPA axis are linked to amyloid-beta associated pathological alterations in the hippocampus, causing degenerations in the negative feedback regulation of the HPA axis leading to hypersecretion of GC. Thus, the development of adrenocortical hyperactivity might be a key-element in the understanding of AD. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available