4.4 Article

Congenital malformations of the diaphragm: findings of the West Midlands Congenital Anomaly Register 1995 to 2000

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 596-604

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.908

Keywords

congenital diaphragmatic hernia; karyotype; mortality; outcome; prenatal diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To describe trends in incidence, associated anomalies, clinical outcomes and sensitivity of prenatal diagnosis for congenital malformations of the diaphragm in the West Midlands Region between 1995 and 2000. Methods Information was retrieved from a population-based register of major congenital malformations in a health region of England, the West Midlands Congenital Anomaly Register (WMCAR), between 1995 and 2000. Results One hundred and sixty-one confirmed cases of congenital malformations of the diaphragm were notified from 396577 births. This gives an incidence of 4.1 per 10000 births. After natural losses and terminations, the incidence at birth was 2.9 per 10 000 registered births. For live-born cases, the infant mortality rate was 317 per 1000 births. 47% of the cases had additional structural or chromosomal anomalies; the infant mortality rate for these complex cases was 533 per 1000, an increased relative risk of 2.37 compared with isolated lesions. 66% of the cases were diagnosed prenatally, 51% of isolated lesions and 84% of complex cases. Fourteen prenatally diagnosed cases (12%) were false-positives; however, 11 of these cases had other significant pathology. These 14 cases were not included in the 161 confirmed cases. Conclusion Congenital malformations of the diaphragm remain associated with considerable infant mortality. Most cases are now diagnosed before birth and the prognosis is adversely affected by the presence of other structural or chromosomal anomalies. This presents significant challenges for those involved in counselling the parents of affected fetuses. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available