4.3 Article

Mutational activation of the RAS-RAF-MAPK and the Wnt pathway in small intestinal adenocarcinomas

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 748-753

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365520410005847

Keywords

APC; beta-catenin; BRAF; KRAS; small intestinal adenocarcinoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Adenocarcinomas of the small and the large intestine share risk factors and morphological features but both turner types seem to follow different genetic pathways. The aim of this study on small intestinal carcinomas was to analyze alternative mechanisms of activation of pathways that are typically affected in colorectal cancer. Methods: Twenty-one sporadic carcinomas were investigated for mutations in KRAS, BRAF, the beta-catenin gene CTNNBI, and the mutational cluster region of APC. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with a monoclonal antibody for beta-catenin, the transcriptionally active downstream component of wnt signaling. Results: Oncogene mutations were found in 13 (62%) small intestinal adenocarcinomas. Twelve tumors displayed a KRAS mutation, and a novel BRAF mutation at codon 603/604 was seen in one carcinoma without KRAS mutation. One tumor harbored a CTNNBI mutation consisting of an insertion of 247 nucleotides deriving from chromosome 9. APC mutations were identified in 2 tumors. immunohistochemistry demonstrated nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin in 5 carcinomas. These carcinomas included the tumor with a CTNNBI mutation but not those with APC mutations. Conclusions: Our data show frequent activation of the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway through mutations of either KRAS or, infrequently, BRAF. Activation of the wnt pathway through accumulation of beta-catenin may have a role in a subset of small intestinal adenocarcinomas but in contrast to colorectal carcinoma, accumulation of beta-catenin is generally not caused by inactivating APC or activating CTNNBI mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available