4.6 Review

Executive control of attention in sleep apnea patients: theoretical concepts and methodological considerations

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 257-267

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2004.01.001

Keywords

obstructive steep apnea; cognitive performance; neuropsychological function; daytime function; sleepiness; sleep disruption; arousal; alertness; attention; executive function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sleep apnea patients' nocturnal breathing disturbances cause daytime sleepiness and cognitive impairments. Attentional capacity and vigilance deficits have often been observed. Moreover, some studies have suggested executive dysfunction, usually assumed to be related to (pre)frontal lobe dysfunction caused by intermittent hypoxemia. However, steep disruption itself has a pervasive influence on cognitive function and affects not only underlying 'lower-level' processes such as arousal and alertness, but also 'higher-level' cognitive processes such as executive attention. This methodological caveat has not been fully taken into account in the steep apnea literature. In order to be able to disentangle these cognitive processes on different levels, sound theoretical neurocognitive frameworks are needed to attain careful analyses and interpretations of neuropsychological data. Therefore, this paper firstly presents an overview of relevant theoretical concepts and models of arousal, attention, and executive function. Then, it is being argued that these theoretical considerations have important methodological implications. These methodological concerns are being addressed by specific experimental and statistical approaches, illustrated by some well-known neuropsychologicat tests. It can be concluded that the reported executive deficits in steep apnea patients should be regarded as tentative, and that more case-controlled studies are needed using fine-grained analyses to parcel complex cognitive abilities into their subcomponents. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available