4.7 Article

Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 292-294

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.082

Keywords

preimplantation genetic diagnosis; aneuploidy testing; IVF efficiency; chromosomal translocation; preimplantation HLA testing; live-born pregnancy outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To review a 12-year experience of the world's three largest preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) centers. Design: Multicenter analysis of the clinical outcome of PGD. Setting: In vitro fertilization programs at the Reproductive Genetics Institute, Chicago, Illinois; Saint Barnabas Medical Center, West Orange, New Jersey; and SISMER, Bologna, Italy. Patient(s): Poor-prognosis IVF patients, patients carrying balanced chromosomal translocations, and couples at risk for producing children with Mendelian disorders. Intervention(s): In vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, polar body removal, blastomere biopsy, and ET. Main Outcome Measure(s): DNA or chromosomal analysis of biopsied polar bodies or blastomeres, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, and live-born pregnancy outcome. Result(s): A total of 754 babies have been born as a result of 4,748 PGD attempts, which shows the expanded application and the practical relevance of PGD for single-gene disorders, chromosomal aneuploidies and translocations, late-onset diseases with genetic predisposition, and nondisease testing in couples at need for human leukocyte antigens-matched offspring for treatment of affected siblings. Conclusion(s): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is evolving to become a clinical option for couples at risk for producing offspring with Mendelian diseases, has a positive numerical impact in standard assisted reproduction practices through aneuploidy testing, and reduces by at least fourfold the spontaneous abortion rate in couples carrying translocations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available