4.4 Article

Event-related brain correlates of associative learning without awareness

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 217-231

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.04.003

Keywords

awareness; perceptual masking; associative learning; event-related potentials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controversy exists about whether associative learning occurs without awareness. In an earlier study using subthreshold (subliminal) stimuli, we reported evidence that such learning could occur as measured by event-related brain potentials [ERP; Cons. Cognit. 6 (1997) 519]. In the present study, we extend these findings by changing several aspects of the methodology in order to provide a more stringent test of this effect and to examine its generality. We used two matched words (murder and cancer) as conditional stimuli (CS); a 100 dB white noise blast as unconditional stimulus (US); a CS-US interval of 3 s; and a full-factorial design with CSs counterbalanced. The conditioning-acquisition phase occurred when the CSs were perceptually unconscious, as confirmed by a subsequent behavioral task. The conditioning-acquisition and postconditioning-extinction phases were examined for ERP evidence of associative learning. The clearest and strongest evidence for associative learning without awareness was observed in the ERP component measures (up to 1 s, poststimulus) in the postconditioning-extinction phase. The CS+ was significantly more positive than the CS- in the P3b-LP component region, which is highly consistent with the results of our earlier study. Differences also were observed in the P1-P2 components. In an unexpected finding, we observed a significant positive slow potential shift for the CS+ in the region between 1 and 3 s poststimulus. We discuss these results and their implications for our understanding of associative learning and awareness. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available