4.2 Article

Genetic structure of the LXS panel of recombinant inbred mouse strains: a powerful resource for complex trait analysis

Journal

MAMMALIAN GENOME
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 637-647

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00335-004-2380-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [U24AA13513, KO1 AA00195, P50 AA13755, R01 AA11984, P60 AA010760] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P20-MH 62009] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The set of LXS recombinant inbred (RI) strains is a new and exceptionally large mapping panel that is suitable for the analysis of complex traits with comparatively high power. This panel consists of 77 strains-more than twice the size of other RI sets- and will typically provide sufficient statistical power (beta = 0.8) to map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that account for similar to25% of genetic variance with a genomewide p < 0.05. To characterize the genetic architecture of this new set of RI strains, we genotyped 330 MIT microsatellite markers distributed on all autosomes and the X Chromosome and assembled error-checked meiotic recombination maps that have an average F-2-adjusted marker spacing of similar to4 cM. The LXS panel has a genetic structure consistent with random segregation and subsequent fixation of alleles, the expected 3-4 x map expansion, a low level of nonsyntenic association among loci, and complete independence among all 77 strains. Although the parental inbred strains-Inbred Long-Sleep (ILS) and Inbred Short-Sleep (ISS)-were derived originally by selection from an 8-way heterogeneous stock selected for differential sensitivity to sedative effects of ethanol, the LXS panel is also segregating for many other traits. Thus, the LXS panel provides a powerful new resource for mapping complex traits across many systems and disciplines and should prove to be of great utility in modeling the genetics of complex diseases in human populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available