4.6 Article

Transient Vibrational Echo versus Transient Absorption Spectroscopy: A Direct Experimental and Theoretical Comparison

Journal

APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 64, Issue 9, Pages 1037-1044

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1366/000370210792434369

Keywords

Transient; Vibrational echo; Ultrafast; Infrared spectroscopy; Nonlinear spectroscopy

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0748501]
  2. University of Michigan
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [748501] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transient dispersed vibrational echo (DYE) spectroscopy is a practical alternative to transient-absorption spectroscopy because it affords increased sensitivity as well as greater signal-to-noise ratio without the need to detect a reference spectrum. However, as a third-order nonlinear probe, the extraction of kinetic information from transient-DVE is somewhat cumbersome compared to transient absorption. This article provides a direct experimental and theoretical comparison between transient-absorption and transient-DVE measurements and presents a framework for analyzing kinetic measurements while exploring the implications or making some simplifying assumptions in the data analysis. The equations for computing the signal-to-noise ratios under different experimental conditions are derived and used in the analysis of the experimental data. The results, obtained under the same experimental conditions, show that for a relatively strong terminal carbonyl stretching mode, signal-to-noise ratios in transient-DVE spectroscopy are approximately 2.5 times greater than transient absorption. The experimental results along with the theoretical models indicate that transient-DVE could become an attractive alternative to transient-absorption spectroscopy for measuring the kinetics of light-induced processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available