4.4 Article

Response to copper toxicity for three ornamental crops in solution culture

Journal

HORTSCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 1116-1120

Publisher

AMER SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.39.5.1116

Keywords

chrysanthemum; miniature rose; geranium; chlorophyll fluorescence; chlorophyll content

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrolytically generated copper is increasingly used to control diseases and algae in the greenhouse industry. However, there is a shortage of information regarding appropriate management strategies for copper in ornamental crop production. The objectives of this study were to characterize the response of three ornamental crops (Dendran-thema xgrandiflorum L. 'Fina', Rosa xhybrida L. 'Lavlinger', Pelargonium xhortorum L. 'Evening Glow') to different solution levels of Cu2+ (ranging from 0.4 to 40 muM) and to determine the critical levels above which toxic responses became apparent. The following measurements were used to assess the treatments: leaf chlorophyll fluorescence (F-v/F-m), leaf chlorophyll content, and visible injury of leaf and root. Excessive copper reduced plant root length, root dry weight, total dry weight, root to shoot ratio, leaf area, and specific leaf area in all three species. The critical solution level of Cu2+ that resulted in significantly reduced plant dry weight for chrysanthemum was 5 pm; for miniature rose, 2.4; and for geranium, 8 muM. Plant visible root injury was a more sensitive and reliable copper toxicity indicator than visible leaf injury, leaf chlorophyll content, F-v/F-m or leaf and stem copper content. Generally, all the species exhibited some sensitivity to Cu2+ in solution culture, with chrysanthemum and miniature rose being most sensitive and geranium being least sensitive. Caution should be taken when applying copper in solution culture production systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available