4.6 Article

Application of the Kubelka-Munk Correction for Self-Absorption of Fluorescence Emission in Carmine Lake Paint Layers

Journal

APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 63, Issue 12, Pages 1323-1330

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1366/000370209790109058

Keywords

Fluorescence; Self-absorption; Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy; Spectroscopic imaging; Scattering; Kubelka-Munk; Carmine lake; Painting; Art conservation

Funding

  1. Bilateral Joint Research and Technology Programme
  2. Italy-Greece and Eu-ARTECH [Eu-AR-TECH, RII3-CT-2004-506171]
  3. Fondazione Cassa di Rispannio Perugia (Italy)
  4. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The variations of the fluorescence emission of carmine lake travelling through an absorbing and scattering medium, such as a paint layer, were investigated by ultraviolet (UV)-visible absorption, fluorescence spectroscopy, and imaging techniques. Samples of the lake were studied in dilute and saturated solutions, on a reference test panel and a real case study. Relevant spectral modifications have been observed as a function of the lake concentration mainly consisting of a fluorescence quenching, red shift of emission maxima, and deformation of emission hand. The application of a correction factor based on the Kubelka-Munk model allowed fluorescence spectra obtained in solution and on painted samples of known composition to be compared and correlated, highlighting that the fluorescence of the lake within paint layers is affected by both self-absorption and aggregation phenomena. This approach has been successfully applied on a painting by G. Vasari for the noninvasive identification of carmine lake. The results reported here emphasize the necessity of taking physical phenomena into account in the interpretation of the fluorescence spectra for a proper and reliable characterization and identification of painting materials in works of art.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available