4.8 Article

Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe - In vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages 475-482

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000137121.28722.33

Keywords

defibrillators, implantable; imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; pacemakers; safety

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL064795-04, K24 HL004194, R01 HL064795, R01 HL-64795, K24 HL004194-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background - MRI has unparalleled soft-tissue imaging capabilities. The presence of devices such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs), however, is historically considered a contraindication to MRI. These devices are now smaller, with less magnetic material and improved electromagnetic interference protection. Our aim was to determine whether these modern systems can be used in an MR environment. Methods and Results - We tested in vitro and in vivo lead heating, device function, force acting on the device, and image distortion at 1.5 T. Clinical MR protocols and in vivo measurements yielded temperature changes <0.5 degrees C. Older ( manufactured before 2000) ICDs were damaged by the MR scans. Newer ICD systems and most pacemakers, however, were not. The maximal force acting on newer devices was <100 g. Modern ( manufactured after 2000) ICD systems were implanted in dogs (n = 18), and after 4 weeks, 3- to 4-hour MR scans were performed (n = 15). No device dysfunction occurred. The images were of high quality with distortion dependent on the scan sequence and plane. Pacing threshold and intracardiac electrogram amplitude were unchanged over the 8 weeks, except in 1 animal that, after MRI, had a transient (<12 hours) capture failure. Pathological data of the scanned animals revealed very limited necrosis or fibrosis at the tip of the lead area, which was not different from controls (n = 3) not subjected to MRI. Conclusions - These data suggest that certain modern pacemaker and ICD systems may indeed be MRI safe. This may have major clinical implications for current imaging practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available