4.5 Article

Genetic dissection of systemic autoimmune disease in Nrf2-deficient mice

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 261-272

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00209.2003

Keywords

systemic lupus erythematosus; microarray; detoxification

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-08089, ES-10042, ES-09090] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008692] Funding Source: Medline
  3. CSRD VA [I01 CX001038] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder with immune-complex deposition that affects multiple organs. Previous studies have suggested the involvement of oxidative stress and apoptosis in SLE, but no clear link to etiology has been established. Here we show that mice deficient in a transcription factor responsible for controlling the expression of numerous detoxification and antioxidant genes develop an autoimmune disease with multiple organ pathologies that closely resembles human SLE. Aged female mice with a knockout of nuclear factor, erythroid-derived 2, like 2 (nrf2) are prone to develop antibodies against double-stranded DNA and the Smith antigen as well as IgG, IgM, and C3 deposition in kidney, liver, heart, and brain. Prior to the development of autoimmune antibodies and organ pathology, oxidative damage occurs in the liver and kidney as indicated by the increased levels of the DNA oxidation marker 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and the later increase in the lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde. Gene expression profiles demonstrate an early decrease in numerous antioxidant and detoxification genes in the livers and altered levels of cytokines and T and B cell-specific genes in the spleens of nrf2 knockout mice. These data strongly suggest that a deficiency in detoxification and increased oxidative stress can result in the development of a systemic autoimmune disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available