4.7 Article

The nature of a gravitationally lensed submillimetre arc in MS0451.6-0305:: two interacting galaxies at z∼2.9?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 352, Issue 3, Pages 759-767

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07982.x

Keywords

gravitational lensing; methods : numerical; techniques : image processing; galaxies : clusters : individual : MS 0451.6-0305; submillimetre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new SCUBA image of the cluster MS 0451.6-0305, which exhibits strong, extended submillimetre flux at 850 mum. The most striking feature in the map is an elongated region of bright submillimetre emission, with a flux density of similar to10 mJy over several beam sizes. This region is apparently coincident with a previously known optical arc [which turns out to be a strongly lensed Lyman break galaxy (LBG) at z = 2.911], as well as with a newly identified multiply imaged ERO (extremely red object) pair predicted to be at a similar, if not identical redshift. By combining a detailed lensing model with deep images from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), Chandra, Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) and spectra from the Very Large Telescope (VLT), we conclude that both the strongly lensed optical arc and ERO systems have properties consistent with known submillimetre emitters. Using a simple model for the two sources, we estimate that the multiply lensed EROs contribute the majority of the flux in the SCUBA lensed arc. Correcting for the lensing amplification, we estimate that the inherent 850-mum fluxes for both objects are less than or similar to0.4 mJy. If the LBG and ERO pair are truly at the same redshift, then they are separated by only similar to10 kpc in the source plane, and hence constitute an interacting system at z similar to 2.9. Higher angular resolution observations in submillimetre/millimetre will permit us to separate the contribution more accurately from each candidate, and better understand the nature of this system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available