4.6 Review

Medial prefrontal cortex is involved in spatial temporal order memory but not spatial recognition memory in tests relying on spontaneous exploration in rats

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages 273-285

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.12.004

Keywords

anterior cingulate; hippocampus; lidocaine; prelimbic; radial-arm maze; recency discrimination; spatial memory; temporal order memory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study describes two novel tasks relying on spontaneous patterns of exploration in a radial-arm maze that can be used to assess spatial recognition memory and spatial temporal order memory (i.e. memory for the order in which places have been visited) in the rat. In the recognition memory task, rats were permitted to freely explore two arms in the maze on a first trial and one 'familiar' arm and one novelly located arm on a second trial 105 min later. In the temporal order memory task, rats were permitted to explore two arms in the maze on a first trial, two novel arms on a second trial 60 min later, and one 'older familiar' arm and one 'more recent familiar' arm on a third trial 45 min later. Using these tasks, we found that rats direct greater exploration at a novel than a familiar arm location, thus showing long-term spatial recognition memory, and at an older familiar arm than a more recent familiar arm, thus showing long-term spatial temporal order memory. Lidocaine inactivation of the mPFC prior to the final trial in each task disrupted performance on the temporal order but not the recognition memory task, thereby demonstrating a role for the mPFC in the retrieval and/or use of temporal order information but not in spatial memory per se. These findings highlight the specific involvement of the rat mPFC in temporal order memory and have important implications for a broader understanding of mPFC function. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available