4.6 Article

Soil microbial communities and activities under intensive organic and conventional vegetable farming in West Java, Indonesia

Journal

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 112-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.03.005

Keywords

Organic farming; Soil quality; Enzyme activity; Microbial biomass; PLFA; Indonesia

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO)
  2. Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR-UOS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared the effect of organic and conventional farming practices on soil microbial dynamics in West Java, Indonesia. A secondary forest was included to obtain natural reference values. On the organic farms, soil fertility is maintained mainly with composted organic matter in contrast to conventional farmers who combine fresh manure and chemical fertilizers, and typically apply large amounts of pesticides. Parameters measured were dehydrogenase, beta-glucosidase, acid phosphomonoesterase and beta-glucosaminidase activity, microbial biomass C (MBC) and microbial community composition by phospholipid fatty acid analysis. A strong negative impact of intensive chemical fertilizer and pesticide use on soil enzyme activities was demonstrated. Dehydrogenase and beta-glucosidase activities were correlated with soil organic matter content and pH. beta-glucosidase activity under organic management approached that under forest, while MBC and dehydrogenase activity remained higher under forest. The composition of the soil microbial community strongly differed between forest and cultivated soil, a clear difference in composition was also observed between conventional and organic farming. Dehydrogenase activity and C16:1 omega 5c, marker fatty acid for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, appeared to be particularly suited as indicators of the impact of management on soil quality and on the soil microbial community. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available