4.6 Article

Characterization of copper-resistant bacteria and assessment of bacterial communities in rhizosphere soils of copper-tolerant plants

Journal

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 49-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.09.004

Keywords

Heavy metal-resistant rhizobacteria; DGGE; Bacterial community; Copper-tolerant plants; Copper mining wasteland

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [40371070, 40871127]
  2. Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development [2006AA10Z404]
  3. 111 project [B07030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thirteen copper-resistant bacteria were isolated from copper-tolerant plant species growing on a copper mine wasteland. The isolates were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and characterized by their resistance to heavy metals and plant growth-promoting characteristics. The assessment of the bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soils of copper-tolerant plants was measured as bands in denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) obtained directly from rhizosphere soil DNA extracts. The isolates were found to exhibit different multiple heavy metal resistance characteristics. Strains SZY6, YJ7 and JYC17 were found to produce indole acetic acid (IAA), siderophore, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase or to solubilize phosphate. Root elongation assay conducted on rape under gnotobiotic conditions with strains MT16, JYC17, SZY6, GZC24, and YJ7 demonstrated increase (from 16 to 41%) in root elongation of inoculated rape seedlings compared to the control plants. In the rhizosphere soil samples the DGGE profiles of the direct DNA extracts were similar. The DGGE profiles indicated that there was no significant correlation between the concentration of available copper in the rhizosphere soils and the number of the visible bands in the DGGE pattern. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available