4.7 Article

TOPEX/Poseidon observations of mesoscale eddies over the Subtropical Countercurrent: Kinematic characteristics of an anticyclonic eddy and a cyclonic eddy

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 109, Issue C8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003JC002026

Keywords

mesoscale eddies; Subtropical Countercurrent; TOPEX/Poseidon

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relative dynamic heights and geostrophic fields were derived from TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry data and then used to track mesoscale eddies over the Subtropical Countercurrent (STCC). The radii, centers, vorticities, shearing deformation rates, stretching deformation rates, divergences, and center velocities of all identified eddies over the STCC were determined using a model that assumes constant velocity gradients. Most eddies are concentrated in a zonal band near 22degreesN, and there is an interannual variation in the number of eddies. A case study was made for a cyclonic eddy and an anticyclonic eddy, with time series of eddy kinematic parameters computed. Both eddies survive for similar to220 days and propagate westward along over 22degreesN-24degreesN to reach the Kuroshio Current east coast of Taiwan, where the eddies were dissipated and in turn affected the Kuroshio Current in many ways. Sea surface temperature data and drifter data confirm the existence of these two eddies. The radii of both eddies vary and their shapes are mostly elliptical during propagation. The anticyclonic eddy propagated almost westward with oscillating north-south components, and the mean speed is 8.3 km/day. The cyclonic eddy moved southwestward before reaching 130degreesE and then moved northwestward, with a mean speed of 7.6 km/day. The propagations of these two eddies are basically consistent with the standard theory of eddy propagation but with larger speeds. The propagating direction could be altered while passing steep bottom topography or merging with the other eddies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available