4.5 Article

The generalization of the extended Stevens operators to higher ranks and spins, and a systematic review of the tables of the tensor operators and their matrix elements

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 16, Issue 32, Pages 5825-5847

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/16/32/018

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spherical (S) and tesseral (T) tensor operators (TOs) have been extensively used in, for example, EMR and optical spectroscopy of transition ions. To enable a systematic review of the published tables of the operators and their matrix elements (MEs) we have generated the relevant tables by computer, using Mathematica programs. Our review reveals several misprints/errors in the major sources of TTOs-the conventional Stevens operators (CSOs-components q greater than or equal to 0) and the extended ones (ESOs-all q) for rank k = 2, 4, and 6-as well as of some STOs with k less than or equal to 8. The implications of using incorrect operators and/or MEs for the reliability of EMR-related programs and interpretation of experimental data are discussed. Studies of high-spin complexes like Mn-12 (S = 10) and Fe-19 (S = 33/2) require operator and ME listings up to k = 2S, which are not presently available. Using the algorithms developed recently by Ryabov, the generalized ESOs and their MEs for arbitrary rank k and spin S are generated by computer, using Mathematica. The extended tables enable simulation of the energy levels for arbitrary spin systems and symmetry cases. Tables are provided for the ESOs not available in the literature, with odd k = 3, 5, and 7 for completeness; however, for the newly generalized ESOs with the most useful even rank k = 8, 10, and 12 only, in view of the large listings sizes. General source codes for the generation of the ESO listings and their ME tables are available from the authors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available