4.7 Article

Large-scale structure shocks at low and high redshifts

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 611, Issue 2, Pages 642-654

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1086/422242

Keywords

cosmology : theory; intergalactic medium; large-scale structure of universe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cosmological simulations show that, at the present time, a substantial fraction of the gas in the intergalactic medium (IGM) has been shock heated to T greater than or similar to 10(5) K. Here we develop an analytic model to describe the fraction of shocked, moderately overdense gas in the IGM. The model is an extension of the Press & Schechter description for the mass function of halos: we assume that large-scale structure shocks occur at a fixed overdensity during nonlinear collapse. This in turn allows us to compute the fraction of gas at a given redshift that has been shock heated to a specified temperature. We show that if strong shocks occur at turnaround, our model provides a reasonable description of the temperature distribution seen in cosmological simulations at z similar to 0, although it does overestimate the importance of weak shocks. We then apply our model to shocks at high redshifts. We show that before reionization, the thermal energy of the IGM is dominated by large-scale structure shocks ( rather than virialized objects). These shocks can have a variety of effects, including stripping less than or similar to10% of the gas from dark matter minihalos, accelerating cosmic rays, and creating a diffuse radiation background from inverse Compton and cooling radiation. This radiation background develops before the first stars form and could have measurable effects on molecular hydrogen formation and the spin temperature of the 21 cm transition of neutral hydrogen. Finally, we show that shock heating will also be directly detectable by redshifted 21 cm measurements of the neutral IGM in the young universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available