4.7 Article

Software reliability prediction model based on support vector regression with improved estimation of distribution algorithms

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 113-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.10.016

Keywords

Support vector regression; Improved estimation of distribution algorithms; Software reliability prediction; Parameters optimization

Funding

  1. Natural Social Science Foundation of China [13BTQ050]
  2. social science foundation from Chinese Ministry of Education [11YJAZH040]
  3. science and technology research program of Wuhan of China [201210121023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Software reliability prediction plays a very important role in the analysis of software quality and balance of software cost. The data during software lifecycle is used to analyze and predict software reliability. However, predicting the variability of software reliability with time is very difficult. Recently, support vector regression (SVR) has been widely applied to solve nonlinear predicting problems in many fields and has obtained good performance in many situations; however it is still difficult to optimize SVR's parameters. Previously, some optimization algorithms have been used to find better parameters of SVR, but these existing algorithms usually are not fully satisfactory. In this paper, we first improve estimation of distribution algorithms (EDA) in order to maintain the diversity of the population, and then a hybrid improved estimation of distribution algorithms (IEDA) and SVR model, called IEDA-SVR model, is proposed. IEDA is used to optimize parameters of SVR, and IEDA-SVR model is used to predict software reliability. We compare IEDA-SVR model with other software reliability models using real software failure data sets. The experimental results show that the IEDA-SVR model has better prediction performance than the other models. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available