4.0 Article

Electronic structures, DNA-binding and related properties of complexes [Ru(bpy)2L]2+ (L = ip, pip, hpip)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE-THEOCHEM
Volume 682, Issue 1-3, Pages 225-233

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.05.026

Keywords

Ru(II); polypyridyl complex; DNA-binding; electronic structure; DFr calculations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Theoretical and experimental studies on the electronic structures, trend in DNA-binding and related properties of a series of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes [Ru(bpy)(2)L](2+) (L = ip, pip, hpip) have been carried out (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine; ip = imidazo[4,5-f] [1,10]-phenanthroline; pip = 2-phenylimidazo [4,5-f][1,10]-phenanthroline; hpip = 2-(hydroxyphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f] [1,10]-phenanthroline). The theoretical calculations were performed applying the density functional theory (DFT) method, and the DNA-binding and the related properties of the complexes were measured with an electronic absorption, emission spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry and so on. Some interesting electronic structural characteristics of these complexes were revealed. First, the electronic structures of complexes [Ru(bpy)(2)pip](2+) 2 and [Ru(bpy)(2)hpip](2+) 3 are quite different from those of the well-known parent complex [Ru(bpy)(3)](2+) and [Ru(bpy)(2)ip](2+) 1 in the occupied frontier molecular orbitals. Second, the HOMO and NHOMO energies of the complexes obviously increase from 1 to 3, whereas their LUMO energies are not obviously varied. Third, the effect of intra-molecular hydrogen bond in complex 3 plays a very important role, it not only enlarges the planarity area of its main ligand, but also makes its LUMO energy reduce to be lower than that of 2. These electronic structural characteristics can be used to reasonably explain the experimental trend in DNA-binding affinities, as well as spectral and electrochemical properties of the complexes. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available