4.8 Article

Chronic inflammation and impaired coronary vasoreactivity in patients with coronary risk factors

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages 1069-1075

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140264.56496.76

Keywords

blood flow; C-reactive protein; coronary disease; endothelium; inflammation

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-331777] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-The goal of this study was to examine a possible association between systemic microinflammation, as reflected by C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels, and coronary vasomotion in patients with coronary risk factors but with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Methods and Results-Coronary vasomotor function was studied in response to cold pressor testing (CPT) in 71 patients with normal angiograms. In all patients, CPT-induced changes in epicardial luminal area (LA; mm(2)) were assessed with quantitative angiography. Within 20 days, myocardial blood flow (MBF) responses to CPT were measured (mL.g(-1).min(-1)) noninvasively with N-13-ammonia and PET imaging. The CPT-induced mean changes in LA and in MBF in patients with elevated CRP (greater than or equal to0.5 mg/dL) were significantly impaired compared with patients presenting with CRP levels within normal range (<0.5 mg/dL) (ΔLA, -1.09±0.86 versus 0.45±0.63 mm(2); ΔMBF, 0.06±0.18 versus 0.44±0.31 mL.g(-1).min(-1); P<0.0001, respectively). Coronary LA changes and MBF responses to CPT were inversely correlated with CRP serum levels (r=-0.84 and r=-0.63; P<0.0001). Lastly, regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between the changes in LA and MBF during CPT for patients with elevated CRP levels and those for patients with normal CRP levels (r=0.56 and r=0.66; P<0.001). Conclusions-These findings suggest a direct association between systemic microinflammation and altered coronary vasomotor function of both the epicardial conductance and the arteriolar resistance vessels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available