Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 5, Pages 436-444Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh243
Keywords
dietary fats; meta-analysis; prostatic neoplasms; review literature
Categories
Funding
- NCI NIH HHS [1R03 CA 78201-01A1, R03 CA078201-01A1, R01 CA 82722] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The authors conducted a detailed review of studies on the association between prostate cancer and total dietary fat along with specific fatty acids. Overall, the 29 studies reporting actual dietary fat levels in grams of fat were heterogeneous, suggesting that pooling of the relative risks may be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was also seen by study design. More specifically, although the pooled estimate for prostate cancer and an increase of 45 g in total fat consumption per day was small (relative risk = 1.2), heterogeneity between studies was large, and the association was not supported by specific fatty acids. The strongest association was found among the five extremely inconsistent studies of alpha-linolenic fatty acid. The associations with advanced prostate cancer were more homogeneous and suggest a relation with total and saturated fat but none with specific fatty acids. This review highlights the inconsistent way in which total dietary fat and specific fatty acids have been measured and reported across epidemiologic studies of prostate cancer. The heterogeneity between studies was large, possibly because of the variation in the dietary instruments used and the corresponding databases (nondifferential misclassification), recall bias, differing case definitions, residual confounding, or potential selection bias in different studies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available