4.6 Article

Interactions of foot-and-mouth disease virus with soluble bovine αVβ3 and αVβ6 integrins

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 18, Pages 9773-9781

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.18.9773-9781.2004

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At least four members of the integrin family of receptors, alpha(V)beta(1), alpha(V)beta(3), alpha(V)beta(6), and alpha(V)beta(8), have been identified as receptors for foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in vitro. Our investigators have recently shown that the efficiency of receptor usage appears to be related to the viral serotype and may be influenced by structural differences on the viral surface (H. Duque and B. Baxt, J. Virol. 77:2500-2511, 2003). To further examine these differences, we generated soluble alpha(V)beta(3) and alpha(V)beta(6) integrins. cDNA plasmids encoding the individual complete integrin alpha(V), beta(3), and beta(6) subunits were used to amplify sequences encoding the subunits' signal peptide and ectodomain, resulting in subunits lacking transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. COS-1 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the soluble alpha(V) subunit and either the soluble beta(3) or beta(6) subunit and labeled with [S-35] methionine-cysteine. Complete subunit heterodimeric integrins were secreted into the medium, as determined by radioimmunoprecipitation with specific monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. For the examination of the integrins' biological activities, stable cell lines producing the soluble integrins were generated in HEK 293A cells. In the presence of divalent cations, soluble alpha(V)beta(6) bound to representatives of type A or O viruses, immobilized on plastic dishes, and significantly inhibited viral replication, as determined by plaque reduction assays. In contrast, soluble alpha(V)beta(3) was unable to bind to immobilized virus of either serotype; however, virus bound to the immobilized integrin, suggesting that FMDV binding to alpha(V)beta(3), is a low-affinity interaction. In addition, soluble alpha(V)beta(3) did not neutralize virus infectivity. Incubation of soluble alpha(V)beta(6) with labeled type A(12) or O-1 resulted in a significant inhibition of virus adsorption to BHK cells, while soluble alpha(V)beta(3) caused a low (20 to 30%), but consistent, inhibition of virus adsorption. Virus incubated with soluble alpha(V)beta(6) had a lower sedimentation rate than native virus on sucrose density gradients, but the particles retained all of their structural proteins and still contained bound integrin and, therefore, were not exhibiting characteristics of a picornavirus A particle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available