4.7 Article

Testing for non-gaussianity in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe data:: Minkowski functionals and the length of the skeleton

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 612, Issue 1, Pages 64-80

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/422570

Keywords

cosmic microwave background; cosmology : observations; methods : statistical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The three Minkowski functionals and the recently defined length of the skeleton are estimated for the co-added first-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data and compared with 5000 Monte Carlo simulations, based on Gaussian fluctuations with the a priori best-fit running-index power spectrum and WMAP-like beam and noise properties. Several power spectrum-dependent quantities, such as the number of stationary points, the total length of the skeleton, and a spectral parameter, gamma, are also estimated. While the area and length Minkowski functionals and the length of the skeleton show no evidence for departures from the Gaussian hypothesis, the northern hemisphere genus has a chi(2) that is large at the 95% level for all scales. For the particular smoothing scale of 3.degrees40 FWHM it is larger than that found in 99.5% of the simulations. In addition, the WMAP genus for negative thresholds in the northern hemisphere has an amplitude that is larger than in the simulations with a significance of more than 3 sigma. On the smallest angular scales considered, the number of extrema in the WMAP data is high at the 3 sigma level. However, this can probably be attributed to the effect of point sources. Finally, the spectral parameter gamma is high at the 99% level in the northern Galactic hemisphere, while perfectly acceptable in the southern hemisphere. The results provide strong evidence for the presence of both non-Gaussian behavior and an unexpected power asymmetry between the northern and southern hemispheres in the WMAP data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available