4.4 Article

Serum leptin levels in asthmatic children treated with an inhaled corticosteroid

Journal

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages 277-280

Publisher

AMER COLL ALLERGY ASTHMA IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61501-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent observations suggest the presence of an interaction between leptin and the inflammatory system; however, there is no adequate knowledge about the role of leptin in atopic states such as asthma. Objectives: To evaluate the potential role of leptin in relation to bronchial asthma and inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Methods: Twenty-three children with mild-to-moderate, newly diagnosed asthma enrolled in this 2-period trial. The control group consisted of 20 age- and sex-matched children. Serum leptin levels were measured in patients at initiation and after 4 weeks of budesonide treatment and were compared with control group measurements. Results: Asthmatic children had higher mean +/- SD serum leptin levels at admission (19.3 +/- 5.1 ng/mL) than after budesonide treatment (10.6 +/- 1.6 ng/mL) and vs control group measurements (9.8 +/- 1.6 ng/mL) (P < .001). There was a significant correlation between serum leptin levels before and after budesonide treatment (r = 0.68; P = .007). Mean +/- SD body mass indices in patients and controls were 16.7 +/- 2.1 and 16.9 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2), respectively. Serum leptin levels did not correlate with body mass indices before budesonide treatment in the study group (r = -0.13; P = .65) but correlated well after budesonide treatment (r = 0.58; P = .009) and in the control group (r = 0.65; P = .008). Conclusions: The role of leptin elevation in children with asthma might be a regulatory mechanism rather than being etiologic, but a question may be raised whether it is possible that leptin may contribute to poor patient outcomes. Further research, both basic and clinical, is essential to explain the exact mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available