4.6 Review

Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 1928-1948

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000139761.05492.D6

Keywords

sepsis; hemodynamic support; fluid resuscitation; vasopressor therapy; inotropic therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To provide the American College of Critical Care Medicine with updated guidelines for hemodynamic support of adult patients with sepsis. Data Source., Publications relevant to hemodynamic support of septic patients were obtained from the medical literature, supplemented by the expertise and experience of members of an international task force convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Study Selection. Both human studies and relevant animal studies were considered. Data Synthesis: The experts articles reviewed the literature and classified the strength of evidence of human studies according to study design and scientific value. Recommendations were drafted and graded levels based on an evidence-based rating system described in the text. The recommendations were de-bated, and the task force chairman modified the document until <10% of the experts disagreed with the recommendations. 4Conclusions. An organized approach to the hemodynamic support of sepsis was formulated. The fundamental principle is that clinicians using hemodynamic therapies should define specific goals and end points, titrate therapies to those end points, and evaluate the results of their interventions on an ongoing basis by monitoring a combination of variables of global and regional perfusion. Using this approach, specific recommendations for fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy, and inotropic therapy of septic in adult patients were promulgated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available