4.5 Article

Quantification of human atherosclerotic plaques using spatially enhanced cluster analysis of multicontrast-weighted magnetic resonance images

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 515-523

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20154

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; coronary disease; atherosclerosis; plaque; cluster analysis

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL71021] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the current limitations of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the lack of an objective method to classify plaque components. Here we present a cluster analysis technique that can objectively quantify and classify MR images of atherosclerotic plaques. We obtained three-dimensional (3D) images from 12 human coronary artery specimens on a 9.4T imaging system using multicontrast-weighted fast spin-echo (T-1-, proton density-, and T-2-weighted) imaging with an isotropic voxel size of 39 mu. Spatially enhanced cluster analysis (SECA) was performed on multicontrast MR images, and the resulting segmentation was evaluated against histological tracings. To visualize the overall structure of plaques, the MR images were rendered in 3D. The specimens exhibited lesions of American Heart Association (AHA) plaque classification types I-VI. Both MR images and histological sections were independently reviewed, categorized; and compared. Overall, the classification obtained from the cluster-analyzed MR and histopathology images showed very good agreement for all AHA types (92%, Cohen's kappa = 0.89, P < 0.0001). All plaque types were identified and quantified by SECA with a high degree of correlation between cluster-analyzed MR and manually traced histopathology data. MRI combined with SECA provides an objective method for atherosclerotic plaque component characterization and quantification. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available