4.5 Article

cAMP protects neutrophils against TNF-α-induced apoptosis by activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase, independently of exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac)

Journal

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages 641-647

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0104005

Keywords

apoptosis; inflammation; cytokine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is unclear by which receptor cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) acts to promote neutrophil survival. We found that 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-2'-O-methyl-cAMP, a specific activator of the recently discovered cAMP receptor, cAMP-regulated guanosine 5'-triphosphate exchange protein directly activated by cAMP, failed to protect human neutrophils from cell death. In contrast, specific activators of cAMP-dependent protein kinase type I (cA-PKI) could protect against death receptor [tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR-1), Fas]-mediated apoptosis as well as cycloheximide-accelerated spontaneous apoptosis. A novel caged cA-PK-activating analog, 8-bromo (8-Br)-acetoxymethyl-cAMP, was more than 20-fold more potent than 8-Br-cAMP to protect neutrophils challenged with TNF-alpha against apoptosis. This analog acted more rapidly than forskolin (which increases the endogenous cAMP production) and allowed us to demonstrate that cA-PK must be activated during the first 10 min after TNF-alpha challenge to protect against apoptosis. The protective effect was mediated solely through cA-PK activation, as it was abolished by the cA-PKI-directed inhibitor Rp-8-Br-cAMPS and the general cA-PK inhibitor H-89. Neutrophils not stimulated by cAMP-elevating agents showed increased apoptosis when exposed to the cA-PK inhibitors Rp-8-Br-cAMPS and H-89, suggesting that even moderate activation of cA-PK is sufficient to enhance neutrophil longevity and thereby contribute to neutrophil accumulation in chronic inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available