Journal
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 215-223Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000022
Keywords
stakeholder views; CASE; method in action; method in tool; stakeholder triangle
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Tool support for information systems ( IS) development can be considered from many perspectives, and it is not surprising that different stakeholders perceive such tools very differently. This can contribute on one side to poor selection processes and ineffective deployment of CASE, and on another to inappropriate tool development. In this paper, the relationship between CASE-tools and IS development methods is considered from three stakeholder perspectives: concept developer, IS developer and product developer. These perspectives, and the tensions between them, are characterised within a 'stakeholder triangle'. Some of the major issues related to each tension are highlighted, and the triangle is then used to consider the importance, and implications for all stakeholders, of considering all tensions together. In particular, we suggest that the concept of 'method in action' be complemented by that of 'method in tool'. We believe that these insights will contribute to the continuing debate on how to reduce adoption failures.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available