4.6 Article

Prospective clinical evaluation of lower cut-offs for galactomannan detection in adult neutropenic cancer patients and haematological stem cell transplant recipients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages 852-860

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05140.x

Keywords

invasive aspergillosis; serology; galactomannan; cut-off value; haematological malignancy; early diagnosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent advent of an improved commercial serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of circulating galactomannan (GM), a major constituent of Aspergillus cell walls, has contributed to the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in many haematology and transplant centres. However, the optimal threshold for positivity remains a matter of debate. We prospectively evaluated the impact of lowering the cut-off in 124 neutropenic episodes with a high pretest probability for IA. Two new cut-off points, lower than previously accepted, are proposed: (a) a 'static' cut-off at 0.8 and (b) a 'dynamic' cut-off at 0.5. A single assay with an optical density (OD) index greater than or equal to0.8 warrants the initiation of anti-Aspergillus therapy. A further lowering of the 'static' threshold seems not clinically feasible given the drop in positive predictive value (PPV). However, the demonstration of at least two sequential sera with an OD greater than or equal to0.5 ('dynamic' threshold) increased the specificity and the PPV to 98.6% and the efficiency to 98%. Applying both cut-offs to a subgroup of 21 'possible' fungal infections further identified and upgraded six cases of IA. However, the clinical benefit of lower cut-offs (particularly for earlier diagnosis) depends upon the kinetics of antigenaemia and the intensity of serum sampling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available