4.7 Article

The rank assessed in a food competition test influences subsequent reactivity to immune and social challenges in mice

Journal

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 468-475

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2003.11.007

Keywords

social stress; BCG; cytokines; corticosterone; mice; individual differences; behavior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether, in a stable social environment, social interactions are responsible for individual, endocrine and immune differences among group members. Cage-mates were classified according to their rank in a food competition test. The influence of the rank was evaluated in two different situations activating neuroendocrine and immune systems. A first experiment used a context of repeated social stress. A second experiment investigated the influence of rank on the response to a bacterial infection by BCG. Endocrine and immune functions were assessed by measuring plasma corticosterone levels, splenocyte proliferation and in vitro cytokine production. In control undisturbed groups, plasma levels of corticosterone were lower in low ranking (LR) mice than in intermediate (IR) and high ranking (HR) mice. LPS-induced splenocyte proliferation and in vitro cytokine production were independent of rank. In response to social stress, corticosterone increased similarly in all categories but the increase in splenocyte proliferation was more pronounced in HR animals. During BCG infection, the rank influenced the production of IL-10 and IFN-gamma by tuberculin-stimulated splenocytes during the acute phase of the infection but not after 94 days of infection. Cytokine production in response to LPS and bacterial growth were not affected by the rank. Therefore, social interactions emerging in a stable social group may be involved in the individual differences observed in endocrine activity and in immune system reactivity. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available