4.3 Article

Physical growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of nonhandicapped low-risk children born preterm

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages 131-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.05.001

Keywords

infants; preterm; LBW

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Outcome studies on the effects of prematurity are increasingly restricted to extremely immature infants with birth weight below 1000 g or gestational age below 26 weeks. In contrast, studies comprising low-risk preterm infants are rare. Aim: To examine growth and neurodevelopmental outcome, 70 low-risk low birth weight (LBW) children without neurological impairment were followed from birth to 7 years of age. At 7 years of age, LBW children were compared to a matched control group born at term. Methods: Postnatal growth was measured at 20 months in the LBW group and at 7 years in LBW and control children. At 20 months, the LBW group was assessed with the Griffiths Scales. At 7 years, LBW and control children were assessed with a neuropsychological test battery comprising tests for language, visual-perceptual, visual-motor, fine and gross motor abilities. Results: At 7 years of age, the frequency of children with low (3rd-9th percentile) or subnormal (<3rd percentile) growth parameters was increased in the LBW group. The Mean Griffiths Developmental Quotient (DO) of the preterm group was normal (102.3 +/- 8.4), and there were only two results below DQ 85. There was no difference between 49 children appropriate for gestational age and 21 small for gestational age (SGA) children. At 7 years of age, reduced mean test results in the range of -0.5 SDS were observed for language and visual-motor abilities in the preterm group. This was due to an increased frequency of LBW children with moderately (SDS -1.0 to -2.0 SDS) subnormal test results. Even for the slightly LBW group (2000 to 2499 g), poorer language abilities were confirmed. Conclusion: All LBW infants, including low-risk populations, should be included in a follow-up program in order to detect deficits early in life and begin treatment before school entry. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available