4.6 Article

23% efficient p-type crystalline silicon solar cells with hole-selective passivating contacts based on physical vapor deposition of doped silicon films

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5037610

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National University
  2. University of Canberra through the Discovery Translation Fund 2.0
  3. Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) through the Solar PV Research and Development Programme [AC/000001]
  4. Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) via Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics (ACAP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Of all the materials available to create carrier-selective passivating contacts for silicon solar cells, those based on thin films of doped silicon have permitted to achieve the highest levels of performance. The commonly used chemical vapour deposition methods use pyrophoric or toxic gases like silane, phosphine and diborane. In this letter, we propose a safer and simpler approach based on physical vapour deposition (PVD) of both the silicon and the dopant. An in-situ doped polycrystalline silicon film is formed, upon annealing, onto an ultrathin SiOx interlayer, thus providing selective conduction and surface passivation simultaneously. These properties are demonstrated here for the case of hole-selective passivating contacts, which present recombination current densities lower than 20 fA/cm(2) and contact resistivities below 50 m Omega cm(2). To further demonstrate the PVD approach, these contacts have been implemented in complete p-type silicon solar cells, together with a front phosphorus diffusion, achieving an open-circuit voltage of 701 mV and a conversion efficiency of 23.0%. These results show that PVD by sputtering is an attractive and reliable technology for fabricating high performance silicon solar cells. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available