4.7 Article

Spatial transformation of motion and deformation fields using nonrigid registration

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1065-1076

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2004.828681

Keywords

atlas; brain deformation; cardiac motion; conjugate map; diffeomorphism; numerical inverse

Funding

  1. MRC [MC_U120061309] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U120061309] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U120061309] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we present a technique that can be used to transform the motion or deformation fields defined in the coordinate system of one subject into the coordinate system of another subject. Such a transformation accounts for the differences in the coordinate systems of the two subjects due to misalignment and size/shape variation, enabling the motion or deformation of each of the subjects to be directly quantitatively and qualitatively compared. The field transformation is performed by using a nonrigid registration algorithm to determine the intersubject coordinate system mapping from the first subject to the second subject. This fixes the relationship between the coordinate systems of the two subjects, and allows us to recover the deformation/motion vectors of the second subject for each corresponding point in the first subject. Since these vectors are still aligned with the coordinate system of the second subject, the inverse of the intersubject coordinate mapping is required to transform these vectors into the coordinate system of the first subject, and we approximate this inverse using a numerical line integral method. The accuracy of our numerical inversion technique is demonstrated using a synthetic example, after which we present applications of our method to sequences of cardiac and brain images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available