4.5 Article

Inbreeding in the seychelles warbler: Environment-dependent maternal effects

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 58, Issue 9, Pages 2037-2048

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00488.x

Keywords

environmental variation; heterozygosity; inbreeding avoidance; inbreeding depression; maternal effects; microsatellites; survival

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/I/S/2002/00712] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deleterious effects of inbreeding can be substantial in wild populations and mechanisms to avoid such matings have evolved in many organisms. In situations where social mate choice is restricted, extrapair paternity may be a strategy used by females to avoid inbreeding and increase offspring heterozygosity. In the cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler, Acrocephalus sechellensis, neither social nor extrapair mate choice was used to avoid inbreeding facultatively, and close inbreeding occurred in approximately 5% of matings. However, a higher frequency of extra-group paternity may be selected for in female subordinates because this did reduce the frequency of mating between close relatives. Inbreeding resulted in reduced individual heterozygosity, which, against expectation, had an almost significant (P = 0.052). positive effect on survival. Conversely, low heterozygosity in the genetic mother was linked to reduced offspring survival, and the magnitude of this intergenerational inbreeding depression effect was environment-dependent. Because we controlled for genetic effects and most environmental effects (through the experimental cross-fostering of nestlings), we conclude that the reduced survival was a result of maternal effects. Our results show that inbreeding can have complicated effects even within a genetic bottlenecked population where the purging'' of recessive alleles is expected to reduce the effects of inbreeding depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available