4.7 Review

Recombinant expression systems in the pharmaceutical industry

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 363-372

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-004-1656-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In terms of downstream processing efficiency, secretory expression systems offer potential advantages for the production of recombinant proteins, compared with inclusion body forming cytosolic systems. However, for high-volume therapeutics like insulin, the product yields of the majority of the potentially available secretory systems is not yet fully competitive. Current strategies to improve productivity and secretion efficiency comprise: (1) enhancement of gene expression rates, (2) optimization of secretion signal sequences, (3) coexpression of chaperones and foldases, (4) creation of protease deficient mutants to avoid premature product degradation and (5) subsequent breeding and mutagenesis. For the production of non-glycosylated proteins and proteins, which are natively glycosylated but are also pharmacologically active without glycosylation, prokaryotes, which usually lack metabolic pathways for glycosylation, are theoretically the most suitable organisms and offer two alternatives: either Escherichia coli strains are conditioned to be efficient secreters or efficient native secreters like Bacillus species are accordingly developed. To fully exploit the secretory capacity of fungal species, a deeper understanding of their posttranslational modification physiology will be necessary to steer the degree and pattern of glycosylation, which influences both folding and secretion efficiency. Insect and mammalian cells display posttranslational modification patterns very similar or identical to humans, but in view of the entailed expenditures, their employment can only be justified if their modification machinery is required to ensure a desired pharmacological activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available