4.3 Article

Six-month magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of large and massive rotator cuff repairs reinforced with porcine small intestinal submucosa

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 538-541

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has been used for reinforcement of other tissues in the body with success and has been shown to act as a bioabsorbable tissue scaffold that promotes and assists healing. The effectiveness of using porcine SIS as a tissue scaffold for reinforcement of rotator cuff repair is unclear. This study evaluates both clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up at 6 months in patients with large and massive rotator cuff tears treated with open repair and SIS reinforcement or interpositional grafting. Eleven consecutive patients who underwent open rotator cuff repair with SIS augmentation for large or massive tears were selected retrospectively, and their charts were reviewed. Magnetic resonance images were then obtained at least 6 months after the index procedure. Patients were evaluated clinically and with a questionnaire, and an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score was calculated. Results showed retear on MRI in 10 of 11 patients with recurrence of large, retracted tears. One repair remained intact by MRI evaluation at 10 months. Clinically, there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative shoulder scores by use of a paired t test analysis (P = .70). Five patients had worse scores postoperatively. We concluded that, though SIS xenografting may be effective in other areas of the body for tendon healing, its use in reinforcement of large and massive rotator cuff repairs seems to be ineffective and does not improve clinical outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available