4.7 Article

Igf-I and breast cancer: A meta-analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 418-423

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20233

Keywords

IGF-I; breast cancer; meta-analysis; case-control study

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IGFs are peptide hormones involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. IGFs are regulated by endocrine and paracrine mechanisms; however, their action in tissue is determined by circulating levels and local production of IGFs and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Some, but not all, epidemiologic studies have associated high circulating levels of IGF-I with increased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women. To evaluate the overall association of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels with breast cancer risk, we performed a meta-analysis on 16 publications of epidemiologic and clinical studies. Analyses were performed for all women as well as for pre- and postmenopausal women separately. Hedges' standardized mean differences (HSMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) were used to estimate the effect of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. Data analysis showed that circulating levels of lGF-I were not significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in controls for all women and for the postmenopausal group (HSMD = 0.024 and 0.035, respectively; p > 0.40) but were significantly higher (HSMD = 0.170, p < 0.001) for the premenopausal group. ORs for breast cancer risk were 1.05 (95% CI 0.94-1.17), 0.93 (95% CI 0.80-1.10) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.16-1.66). The HSMD of IGFBP-3 was 0.18 (p < 0.001), and the OR for breast cancer was 1.42 (95% CI 1.15-1.74) for premenopausal women. Our results support the suggested association between high IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels and increased risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available